• The title (must be concise but informative).
• The initial(s) and name(s) of the author(s).
• The full institutional addresses of all authors.
• The address and e-mail to which the proofs should be sent.

Mathematical symbols and formulae
All characters should be typed. To prevent confusion, similar looking (or rarely used) symbols should be distinguished clearly and, if necessary, explained in the text. Please avoid possible confusion between letters and numbers (L, and I, I and 1, o and zero) and between Greek letters and Roman letters (nu, upsilon and v, rho and p, kappa, chi and x, epsilon and E) etc.

Equations
Equations should be numbered sequentially with arabic numerals in parentheses on the right hand side, i.e. (1), (2), etc. If too long, split them accordingly. If there are chemical formulae included, i.e. reactions, please number them (R1), (R2), etc.

Figures
All figures, whether colour illustrations, photographs, line drawings or images, should be submitted as separate files in one of the stated formats and numbered in the order of occurrence in the text. The inscriptions and labelling should be clearly legible.

References
Reference list:
Only works that are cited in the text and that have been accepted for publication or published already should be listed alphabetically at the end of the paper under the first author's name, while works "submitted to" or "in preparation" or "in review" or only available as preprint should not be included in the reference list. They must be listed in a footnote directly in the text. "Private communication" and private webpages are only allowed in the text. This decision was made on the EGU Council Meeting on 30 April 2004 and is valid for all EGU Publications. Two or more works by two authors should be listed alphabetically according to the second author's name. Works by three or more authors should be listed chronologically. If there is more than one work by the same author or team of authors in the same year, a, b, c etc. is added to the year both in the text and in the list of references. Please supply full author list with Last Name and Initial(s). If this is not possible, then at least the first 3 authors then "et al." may be used. After the list of authors the complete reference title has to be named. Journal names are abbreviated according to the Chemical Abstract Service Source Index, followed by the volume number, the complete page numbers (first and last page) and the publication year. Please write out titles in full, if abbreviation is not known.

Line art
All line art (line/vector graphs) must be true vector encapsulated postscript (.eps) created from graphics-creation software (e.g. Illustrator, CorelDraw, Freehand, etc). The fonts must be embedded in the .eps file, using standard or Postscript fonts. Please avoid unconventional fonts that may not be recognized. Choose a font type and size (and thickness) that is clearly readable on the final scale, such as Arial 12 pt, remembering that the final typeset paper is in a two column format. Avoid faint lines and font colours. No lines lighter than ½ point, i.e. do not use hairline rules. Thin white lines and text on a dark background are not recommended as they may not print out well because the white lines are "flooded" due to dithering. By thickening these lines and text, it will help a great deal. Avoid printing millions of dots or lines on top of each other. In vector graphics, this results in unnecessary large files.

Submission to BIOGEOSCIENCES
The final article (after the reviewing and approval of the Guest-Editor) must be submitted to the Publication Production Office in the following way:
in digital format and preferably, zipped or not zipped, by file-upload, email or ftp to the Editorial Support or to the Production Office, respectively; however, work submitted on diskette or CD-ROM will also be accepted. Hardcopy manuscripts have to be sent by mail and under no circumstances by fax!

For ftp submission, please contact the Editorial or the Production Office to receive a password and the ftp address.

[1]{Institute for Historical Geophysics, Houston, Texas}
[2]{School for Military Advances, London, United Kingdom}
[*]{now at: Playa del Ingles, Gran Canaria}
Correspondence to: J. G. Smith (jgsmith@coldmail.com)

To date, very little has been written about the very important role played by the magnetosphere during the conquest of the Western Hemisphere. This paper tries to fill this gap by drawing on historical documents from the years 1492 to 1888, the most vital years for this development. Almost no conclusions are drawn as the influence appears to approach absolute zero.

1. Introduction

With the discovery of America (Columbus, 1492) a new continent was opened up. However its full exploitation by Europeans and their offspring was not fully complete until many centuries later, as reported by James et al. (1776).
During this interval, known as the Winning of the West (Smith and Weston, 1954), a major role in the development of the continent was played by the lowly revolver (e.g. Green et al., 1900). Recently, Phillips (1999) suggested that the magnetosphere could have played an even more significant role. In order to pursue this conjecture, the authors of this work have carried out a historical survey and have found startlingly little evidence for such a claim.

2. The discovery

America was discovered by Columbus (1492), as illustrated in Fig. 2.Without the use of the compass, this would never have been possible. In fact, this could be considered the most important (and only) contribution of the geomagnetism to the development of the American continent. A painting of Christopher Columbus is shown in Fig. 1.
The subsequent taming of the West took place with considerable quantities of lead, but since this metal is non-magnetic, there are no geomagnetic variances attributed to it.

3. The next five centuries

In Sect. 1, the discovery of America was described. Here we will outline the subsequent history until the present. This is best summarized in Table 1.
As can be seen from Table 1, there is almost no mention of geomagnetism or the magnetosphere at all. This sorry situation is discussed further and explained away in Sect. 4.

3.1   The mathematics of development

The complete mathematical description is beyond the scope of this report, but can be found in Smith and Weston (1954). The basic equation is

 

.	(1)
In addition to Eq. (1), we also have
,	(2)
,	(3)
.	(4)
Equations (1) and (2) together describe the entire time development of the history of America. Again no geomagnetic term enters.

3.1.1   Pseudo-mathematics

In addition to the true mathematics mentioned above, there are a number of pseudo-mathematical theories, but these cannot be seriously considered by reputable scientists.

3.2   The chemistry of development

An important equation in the chemistry of the development is


C8H18 + 12.5 O2 ® 8 CO2 + 9 H2O.	(5)
Moreover, it is necessary to consider photochemistry:
O3 + hn ® O2 + O.	(6)

4. Conclusions

Considering Fig. 2 and Table 1 we see that the influence of the geomagnetic and magnetospheric terms is negligible. Furthermore, Eqs. (1) and (2) add no insight to the problem. We must therefore conclude that Phillips (1999) incorrectly supposed such a connection to exist.

In spite of this negative result, research will continue on this highly interesting question. For if it were to prove correct, then the consequences would be enormous to say the least.