HYDROCHORAL DISPERSAL
AS A FACTOR OF GENETIC INTEGRATION AND DIFFERENTIATION OF CONIFEROUS
POPULATIONS
Sannikova N.S., Sannikov S.N.
Botanical Garden of the Ural Division RAS, Russia,
stanislav.sannikov@botgard.uran.ru
The study of methods, paths and
rates of dispersal of tree populations in postglacial epochs is necessary for
establishment and interpretation of regular features of their origination,
migration, range dynamics and genetic differentiation. According to
radioisotope dating data of the palynological analysis, common pines spread
after the waning ice from the Alps and the
Carpathians at a rate of 350-600
km in 1000 years, while the Siberian spruce propagated
from the Urals at a rate of up to 210 km in 1000 years in the Holocene. However,
such a rapid dispersal could not proceed only by the anemochorous dissemination
of their seeds since its rate is not over 50-60 km in 1000 years
(Shimanyuk, 1955; Udra, 1988). Our experiments (Sannikov, 1976; Sannikov,
Sannikova, 2007) suggest a theoretical possibility of the long-range rapid
transport of common pine seeds by rivers.
The comparative experimental and large-scale
studies of the rate and the range of anemochorous and hydrochorous dispersals
of common pine populations and the analysis of their genetic integration and
differentiation in adjacent river basins yielded the following results.
The maximum effective (for the
further "relay-race" dispersal of populations) propagation rate of the pine self-sown at the center of the
range on an optimal tilled substrate is not over 3000-3500 m in one reproductive
year (30-35 years), i.e. 90-140
km in a millennium, even in mast years. In the
fore-tundra zone, where the seed yield and the height of trees are several
times smaller, the dispersal rate of pines probably is one order of magnitude
slower.
Experiments demonstrate that winged
seeds of pines remain afloat on the river water surface for up to 7-8 days and
then sink. However, they preserve their germinating capacity (42%) for as long
as one week and become fully non-emergent only in 22-24 days after sinking. If
the average velocity of the river flow is about 2.5 km/h, the theoretical
propagation range of seeds by rivers can be up to 500-600 km/year. It is many
orders of magnitude larger than their anemochorous range. According to our
observations, floatability of spruce seeds is a little worse. The floatability period
of weeping birches is up to 10 days, while seeds of Crimean pines have no
floating capacity at all. It was found that even along the rapid mountain river
Lomnitsa in the Carpathians the dispersal of the self-sown of common pines and
Norway spruces progresses at a rate of at least 17-20 km in a decade or 1700-2000 km in 1000 years. It
may be assumed that the hydrochory is the dominant method of the dissemination
of seeds and the dispersal of coniferous populations in plains of Northern Eurasia where rivers flow predominantly to the
north.
This hypothesis is confirmed by a
high genetic similarity of Pinus
sylvestris populations in transects along river beds (Tobol, Dnepr,
Northern Dvina, Angara, Selenga).
Their Nei genetic distances (Nei, 1978) generally do not exceed the population
class (0.007-0.008). At the same time, the distances are 1.5-2.5 times larger
in transects crossing watersheds of adjacent rivers. The maximum
differentiation (0.024±0.005) – at the level of geographical groups of
populations – is found between adjacent basins of mountain
rivers in the Ukrainian Carpathians, which are separated by ridges up to
800 m
high. Finally, the analysis of paths of dispersal of Pinus sylvestris populations in the Holocene in Europe
using the latest paleobotanical studies (Cheddadi et. al., 2006) shows that the
paths are almost coincident with directions of river flows.
Thus, the hydrochory of seeds by
rivers is undoubtedly one of the most important factors determining paths of
the post-Pleistocene migration, the degree of genogeographical integration and
differentiation of tree populations in Northern Eurasia.
The study was supported by RFBR
(project No. 05-04-48667) and RF HSS foundation (grant No. 9692.2006.4).